Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts

20 September 2007

Senior officials appointed for Iraqi refugees


After months of calls for increasing the number of refugee admissions to the U.S. from Iraq, the Bush administration responded several months ago by agreeing to allow 7000 refugees into the country. The figure, illustrated in comparison to the graphic above, was considered a paltry response by human rights organizations and other Middle Eastern countries.

In response to the continued criticism, yesterday the Bush administration announced that it was taking yet more steps to alleviate the refugee crisis in Iraq by designating two senior officials to oversee the refugee process and remove some of the roadblocks that define it. That in itself might have been useful, had one of the senior officials not been James Foley, former U.S. ambassador to Haiti. Haiti, as some may recall, suffered under an extremely restrictive refugee policy that denied entry to thousands who sought to flee the war-torn nation off the U.S. coast. In fact, Haiti’s refugee crisis in the 1990s was then considered one of the more callous decisions made by both the Bush and Clinton administrations, who were happy to engage in the fight over Cuban refugee Elian Gonzales, but remained uninterested in the largely poor and uneducated Haitians trying to escape one of the deadliest, poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere.

James Foley should have all the experience he needs: faced with a violent situation exacerbated by an exponentially growing humanitarian crisis, he should know just how few Iraqis the U.S. can admit in order to save face.

Image source: New York Times online


19 September 2007

FGM Banned in Egypt

The BBC & New York Times reported today that Egypt has banned the practice of female genital mutilation (or female circumcision, as supporters call it) universally. One of the interesting things noted in the Times’ coverage was the shift in social taboos surrounding the topic in Egypt. Unlike years past, the media in Cairo and other cities now uses far more explicit language to discuss botched operations that result in excess scarring or the death of the woman (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/world/middleeast/20girls.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5070&en=04934e7ed73d6aac&ex=1190865600&emc=eta1).

This spells progress on multiple fronts. Not only has the practice become more discussed and publicly banned (and one can hope that this will spread to sub-Saharan Africa, where the practice is far more widespread than it is in the north of the continent), but it speaks well to the pressure that transparent public discourse can bring on the issue. Marking the times when the practice goes wrong makes it harder for advocates to insist that because their wives and mothers turned out alright, their daughters will too. And I would like to think that breaking social taboos can, in fact, have a significant impact on the political will to act.

This and other pieces are cross-posted at http://web.mac.com/caitlin.howarth/iWeb/thedial